New Study Analyzes the Optimal Timeframe for Administering CPR

A new report out of the New England Journal of Medicine has found that longer CPR – that is, administering the technique for as much as two minutes – is not of substantial benefit to the victim of cardiac arrest.  In fact, in some instances, it may make things worse.


Ultimately, experts are still trying to determine how much CPR is enough.  The technique, of course, increases blood flow to the heart and enables the victim to respond more effectively to defibrillation.  What’s not known is if 30 seconds of CPR or, say, two minutes of CPR is the optimal amount of time before administering shocks to the heart.


Another element of the study which should be taken into consideration is the the fact that researchers looked at CPR as administered by emergency personnel and paramedics only and did not factor in bystander CPR.


As such, the trial’s representatives insisted that bystanders should continue to administer the technique as soon as possible and as dictated by their onsite CPR certification instructors.

100% Satisfaction Guarantee

About the author

I spent 15 years as a firefighter and paramedic...

And too often I would arrive on the scene of someone unconscious, surrounded by a circle of people feeling helpless. Sometimes those people would even have CPR training but lacked the confidence and experience to act.

That’s why I started SureFire CPR. Our classes are practical and engaging – teaching you the crucial skills you need to know what to do and feel empowered to take action.

Zack Zarrilli Signature
Zack Zarrilli, Founder

Related Posts


Know exactly what to do when tragedy strikes!

Get the Free Ultimate CPR Guide

Your info will never be passed on to third parties. Read our privacy party to learn how we keep your data safe.